The LMS isn't the problem. It rarely is.
Over the years I've seen organisations convinced they needed a new platform. Different interface, better features, fresh start.
And sometimes that's true.
But more often, when you look closely, the platform isn't what's letting them down.
It's what's around it.
A catalogue that's not easy to navigate. Course names that made sense to whoever built them three years ago, and maybe a handful of others. Completion data that tells you something happened, but not whether it mattered. Admin processes held together with manual workarounds and institutional memory.
Swap out the LMS and you take all of that with you.
The platform gets the blame because it's visible. The structure around it is invisible, until someone has to use it, report from it, or hand it over to someone new.
